TradingView Brokers — What We Verified, and What We Have Not
Compiled by the traderpublic research desk
Trading from a TradingView chart means the broker is wired into TradingView's order routing, which is a different thing from a broker whose own platform merely shows similar charts. That integration is a platform fact, and our hub does not publish one yet.
The licence trail is the checked part: each published record read from the regulator's own register on the date shown, with perk and desk-score rows from our research desk. The TradingView integration, deposit, spread, leverage, demo and copy-trading values are written in per broker, labelled as written-in, and are not checked facts about that firm.
Trading CFDs carries a high risk of losing money. Nothing on this page is advice to open an account with any firm.
Broker records we publish
Ordered by the traderpublic desk score on each record. Records our desk has not scored are not ranked here.
This order is our published desk score, which covers the broker overall. It is NOT a TradingView ranking: no integration fact on this page has been checked per broker.
Your capital is at risk. Licence facts only — not a recommendation.
Platforms
Made upMT5, WebTrader, mobile app
Minimum deposit
Made up$25
Spread from
Made upfrom 0.9 pips (EUR/USD)
Maximum leverage
Made upup to 1:1000
Demo account
Made upDemo account available
Copy trading
Made upCopy trading available
What the desk checked
✓Swap-free accountofferedOffered on request via the Back Office; fees may apply once positions on certain instruments stay open a set number of days.source · read on 16 Sept 2026
–Islamic accountnot checked
✓Negative balance protectionofferedStated in the Client Agreement; clients may never lose more than their total deposits.source · read on 16 Sept 2026
✓Segregated client fundsofferedHeld in separate bank accounts with named custodian banks.source · read on 16 Sept 2026
✓No deposit feeofferedThird-party or bank fees may still apply.source · read on 16 Sept 2026
✓No withdrawal feeofferedE-wallet withdrawals can carry a fee if no trading took place.source · read on 16 Sept 2026
–Cent accountnot checked
✕24/7 supportnot offeredFxPro publishes 24/5 weekday support hours, not 24/7.source · read on 16 Sept 2026
–Thai-language supportnot checked
Licences verified2 of 2 checked against the register
The broker is authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, the UK regulator for financial services firms, under licence number 509956, listed as authorised.
The broker is authorised by CySEC, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission for investment firms, under licence number 078/07, listed as authorised.
Use it to compare at a glance, then read the licence trail under each broker below — that is the part our desk checked against the regulator's register.
Made up Every row in this table is written in, not checked per broker
What a TradingView page should tell you — and what we have not published
The licence row is verified. The integration rows are written-in illustrations of the column, labelled as such; the rest is named as unpublished rather than left blank.
Licences we verified against the register✓
TradingView order routing offeredMade upexample shape: trade-from-chart via a linked TradingView account
Whether a paid TradingView plan is requiredMade upexample shape: free TradingView plan sufficient for order routing
Order types available from the chartnot published
Symbols tradable through the integrationnot published
Licences we checked ourselves
This is the part of the page that rests on evidence: each licence number was read from the regulator's own public register on the date shown.
Can I trade with any broker from a TradingView chart?
No. The broker has to be integrated with TradingView's order routing, and the list of those brokers changes. We do not publish it yet, so check TradingView's own broker panel before relying on it.
Do I need a paid TradingView plan?
That depends on the broker and on TradingView's own terms, and it is one of the rows we have not published. The written-in row shows the shape of the answer, not the answer.
What the trading platform actually is, and who supplies it
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and TradingView are not brokers. They are software: a chart window, an order ticket and a connection to whichever firm holds your account. The same platform can sit in front of very different businesses, so knowing that a firm offers MT4 tells you nothing about how it executes your order or who regulates it.
This matters for a page like this one. A platform list is a list of software compatibility, not a list of quality. The part of this page that carries weight is the licence trail, because that is the part naming a regulator who can act against the firm.
MetaTrader 4
Released in 2005 and still the most widely deployed retail terminal. Four order types, nine timeframes, and the largest ecosystem of third-party indicators and automated strategies, written in MQL4.
MetaTrader 5
A separate product, not an upgrade path. More timeframes, an economic calendar, depth of market, and a different language (MQL5) that will not run MQL4 programs without a rewrite.
TradingView
Primarily a charting and analysis service that can connect to a broker for order entry. Charts and community scripts live in the browser; the account stays with the broker.
How to check a firm's platform access for yourself
The research hub publishes no per-broker platform field, so the values in the table above are written in and labelled as such. These steps let you establish the real answer in a few minutes, and they work for any firm, including ones not listed here.
Open the firm's own platform page and note which terminals it names. If a platform is only mentioned in a blog post or a help article, treat that as unconfirmed.
Check which account types carry it. Access is often limited to one account tier, and a demo account may offer a platform the live account does not.
Open a demo and place a test order. A firm can be a listed MT5 partner while its own bridge is unavailable in your region.
For TradingView, confirm the broker appears in TradingView's own broker list inside the chart window, not only on the broker's marketing page.
Check the mobile app separately. Desktop access and mobile access are frequently not the same.
MT4 versus MT5: not an upgrade, a different product
The version numbers suggest a succession, and that is misleading. MT5 is a separate program with its own strategy language. An automated strategy or custom indicator written for MT4 will not run on MT5 without being rewritten, which is the single biggest reason MT4 is still in service two decades after release.
Reasons people stay on MT4
An enormous library of existing MQL4 indicators and automated strategies, much of it free
Lighter on older machines and on a slow connection
Familiar to anyone who has traded retail forex in the last fifteen years
Widest broker support, so moving firms rarely means relearning the terminal
Reasons people move to MT5
More timeframes, and depth-of-market data where the broker supplies it
A built-in economic calendar and an integrated strategy tester that handles multiple currencies
Exchange-traded instruments alongside forex and CFDs, where the firm offers them
MQL5 is a fuller language, and new third-party development has largely moved there
Can you trade on a platform without a broker?
No. The platform draws charts and sends instructions; it holds no money and is not a counterparty. Your order reaches a market through the firm that holds your account, which is also the firm that a regulator licenses and that owes you the protections attached to that licence.
That is why this page ranks firms rather than software, and why the licence rows are the rows we verified against a regulator's own register.
Automated strategies deserve particular care. A strategy bought from a third party is code you did not write, running against your live account, and past results shown in an advertisement are not evidence about the future. Test on a demo account long enough to see it handle a volatile session before you fund it.
How this ranking is put together
The order on this page is the research desk's published score for the whole broker, tie-broken by the number of licences we verified against a regulator's own register. It is not a score for this category, because we have not measured this category.
Every licence is read on the regulator's own register, and the date we read it is printed beside it
A product term is only marked available or not offered when the desk checked it and cited a source
A term nobody has checked stays labelled as unchecked rather than being dropped from the page
Written-in values exist only where the research hub publishes no field, and each one is labelled where it appears
This page ranked brokers on the score the research desk publishes for the whole firm, and showed the licence trail behind each one. That much is checked: every licence number here was read on the regulator's own register, on the date printed beside it.
It did not establish who is best for TradingView brokers. No field on this site measures that yet, so the page marks the gap instead of filling it, and labels every value that was written in rather than checked. Treat the order as a starting point for your own checks, not as a recommendation.
Other broker pages on this site
Each one states its own criterion and its own gaps.
This page is compiled by the traderpublic research desk from the broker records published on this site. The desk reads regulator registers and brokers' own terms pages, and records the date of every reading.
On this page the desk verified the licence trail of every broker listed, and published a score only where it had one to publish.
We publish no individual byline for a compiled category page. The work is the desk's, and naming a single author would suggest a judgement one person made.
